Tuesday, November 3, 2009

RJA #9: Evaluation of Sources

Book: Enlightened Democracy: The Case for the Electoral College
Person Evaluated: Tara Ross
Conclusion: Tara Ross is a lawyer and has focused on law, public policy, and constitutional history. She seems to be a public figure of sorts; she often appears as a guest on different talk shows. She also has been published in several law reviews and newspapers, including the National Law Journal, USA Today, the American Enterprise Online, National Review Online, WeeklyStandard.com, FoxNews.com, HumanEvents.com, The Washington Times, and the Texas Review of Law & Politics.

Periodical: Don't Mess with the Electoral College
David Lewis Schaefer
Conclusion: David Schaefer is a political science professor. He has written several books and seems to be a credited writer. He has written a lot for periodicals like the Wall Street Journal.

Website: Save The Electoral College
Paul Greensberg
Conclusion: Greensberg is a long time conservative writer. He has written lots of books and has written for townhall for a long time.

NARA
This is a government site. I think most of what comes here is creditable. There are also links to the electoral college website.

Citizendium
This is a lot like Wikipedia. From what it look like the information here is good but there is a works cited to I can check if everything is reliant or not.

PBS: Pros and Cons of the Electoral College
There are two people involved in this dialogue: George Edwards and Alexander Keyssar.
George Edwards is the author of the book, Why The Electoral College Is Bad For America. He teaches political science at Texas A&M. Alexander Keyssar is a history and social science professor at Harvard.

RJA #8a: Websites

Resource: Sweet Search
Keywords: Electoral College Support
Search Strategies: Boolean
Number of Hits: Does not give a cumulative number
Relevance: 5

Resource: Metacrawler
Keywords: electoral college necessary
Search Strategies: Boolean
Number of Hits: 43
Relevance: 2

Resource: Yahoo Directory
Keywords: U.S. Presidential Elections>Electoral College
Search Strategies: Followed the Directory
Number of Hits: 12
Relevance: 3

Resource: incywincy
Keywords: electoral college support
Search Strategies: boolean
Number of Hits: 10
Relevance: 2

Resource: Soovie
Keywords: Electoral college history support pros and cons debate reform system
Search Strategies: boolean math
Number of Hits: N/A
Relevance: 5

RJA #8b: Social Media

Resource: Technorati
Keywords: Electoral, College, System, Relevance, Support, Reasons
Search Strategies: boolean and math
Number of Hits: 0-180
Relevance: I tired several times to use this site but I could not get anything good: 0

Resource: Collecta
Keywords: Electoral college support
Search Strategies: mathmatical
Number of Hits: N/A (does not say)
Relevance: 1

RJA #8c: Multimedia

Resource Used: Blinkx
Keywords Used: electoral college reasons
Search Strategy: Boolean
Number of Hits: 837
Relevance: 3

Internet Research Project

  • Viewzi
  • Summary: Basically it uses both google and yahoo to search. But what sets it apart is all of the different ways that you can view the results. Some of the options to view are more useful than others, but some are just useless.
  • Strengths: Because you can make your own account you can personalize viewzi and make it your own. It is also much more interesting to look at and use.
  • Weaknesses: Some of the viewing options are pointless and does not do anything helpful, but it probably depends on what you are searching and your topic.
  • Databases: Viewzi does not use it's own database, it uses yahoo and google's.
  • Operators: Supports both Boolean and Mathematical operations.
  • Case Sensitivity: No
  • Stop Words: Everything is searched for.
  • Advance Search Function: as far as I can see, there is no advanced option.
  • Limits: Does not allow for an advanced search and can become slightly overwhelming with all of the different viewing options.
  • Sorting: Sorted by relevance and popularity.
  • Display: The display is really what sets viewzi apart from the rest. It is crisper, colorful, and just all around better to look at than most search tools.
  • Help Function: There was none that I could find.
  • Special Features: Create and account and multiple ways to view results.

RJA #7a: Internet Research Tools

Like most, I usually just use google. It is mostly because it gets the job done for most day to day searches and it is on my toolbar in my browser. Like most complaints with google, a too many results come from a search and they may not be very great. So far I really like the search tool that was given to me, I will probably use it a lot. I also get a lot of good stuff from the school resources.

RJA #7b: Internet Research Tool Test

Because of how viewzi is set up there are lots of different ways that my results came up. One of the first searches I did that brought up a good amount of results was "importance*electoral*college". I got 37 results in the simple text option, 20 from the yahoo option, and there are a lot more options to choose from. As far as relevance goes, it is a 5 of 5. I can't really see anything that is not relevant. This specific search is very useful.